Fiscal views

 Fiscal

I am a Social Democrat (including Austromarxism) , instinctive Anarcho Libertarian (Left Rothbardism) Social Anarchist (Anarcho Syndicalist, Mutual Aide) , Libertarian Municipalist, and Autonomous Marxist 

I support State Socialism (with strong worker’s rights, a strong centralized state and economic collectivism and that is similar to European Socialism) and Revolutionary spontaneity

I am fiscally responsible

I support the Labour Party UK  (current Labour Party UK Social Democracy/some aspects of 2017-2019 Labour Party UK Social Democracy/Guild Socialism)  

I support the Labour Party UK absorbing the Social Democrats from the Liberal Democrats UK party 

I support a Homeless Left fiscal system (like in the 1920s Germany) replacing Democratic Socialism within the Labour Party UK as the middle ground between Communism and Social Democracy

Outside of Labour Party Social Democracy, I support the type of Social Democracy that was done throughout the world from the early mid 1920s through mid 1930s, especially from the mid late 1920s through the early 1930s. I can put up with a Nordic Model economy

I also support pre policy Social Democracy which includes a mix of the early to mid 20th century United States economic policies with USSR like planned economy (ie like the one under Marxism-Leninism) but with more actual socialism  

All of my economic views have elements of socialistic Ordo (Neoclassical) Syriza ‘Neoliberalism’ 

I want either an eventual State Socialist (strong worker’s rights, a strong centralized state and economic collectivism and that is similar to European Socialism) society or a City State (radically localized)-Bioregional-Libertarian Municipalism society

To implement a transition to State Socialism (with strong worker’s rights, a strong centralized state and economic collectivism and that is similar to European Socialism) we need to defeat Neoliberalism (including Capitalism), Constitutional Republicanism-Conservatism,  Globalization/Western Imperialism (too offset Global Capitalism), great power chauvinism society and socialist revisionism (which keeps Neoliberalism and Capitalism afloat)

There are four methods we can use to achieve a State Socialist (with strong worker’s rights, a strong centralized state and economic collectivism and that is similar to European Socialism) society

The first method would be through a Revolutionary Vanguard that fuses Social Democracy with this type of revolutionary socialism as a way to make this happen but in a way like the SDAP balanced Austromarxism with this vanguard revolutionism as mentioned here and in The Austrian Socialist Experiment: Social Democracy and Austromarxism, 1918-1934 from pp. 178–179, and on pp 206

This unique Revolutionary Vanguard method would have working class class consciousness being achieved more organically through the national autonomy maintenance 

This unique Revolutionary Vanguard would be a totality of people bound together through a common destiny into a community with character. The march to a State Socialist (with strong worker’s rights, a strong centralized state and economic collectivism and that is similar to European Socialism) society would include a synthesis of the notion of nationhood . 

This transition would be done in a way that makes it evident that national identity is not necessarily obstructive toward class consciousness which would be achieved through a shared national identity as opposed to the capitalist tendency of spatial planning which results in imperialism and or globalism . It would exist as a useful praxis for worker self-determination . 

It would basically fuse classes with a national development and growth program. It would include a focused and strategic use of direct state power and funding to increase economic growth in certain areas due to the nation's needs during this transition. This basically means that the product of the worker's labor would belong to the community as a whole

It would fix the issue of the tendency of lower class people to cling to traditions that hold them back and attach them to the bourgeois capitalistic institutions and cultural and territorial means

This Revolutionary Vanguard would gather the geographically divided members of the same nation. It would organize nations not in territorial bodies but in simple association of persons and thus radically disjoin the nation from its territory while making the nation a non territorial association

So to create this State Socialist revolution under this method, we would have to use a path of social democracy to achieve this. This includes granting major and permanent concessions to the proletariat and generating lasting transformations in the social and economic structure

This Revolutionary Vanguard method would reject elitism as a method for the dissemination of class consciousness and not use a Bolshevik type vanguard.It would be an organic movement from a working class groundswell of class awakening and gradual transition toward State Socialism (with strong worker’s rights, a strong centralized state and economic collectivism and that is similar to European Socialism).

Furthermore, this revolutionary Vanguard would also have Left ‘CPUSA Left ‘reactionary’’ ideology that is anti establishment, banally patriotic (as noted above in the nationalistic part) , Anti Bolshevik (since Austromarxism is opposed to the Bolshevik model of revolution), and Isolationist toward the Middle East (since the US being involved in the affairs of the Middle East has hurt the US economy for decades)

The second method is through spreading a socio-fiscal system that can be labeled interchangeably as State Capitalism, Bureaucratic Collectivism, State Stalinism (including Socialism in One Multipolar Country) and a unique Mode of Production. This system is similar to State Socialism (with strong worker’s rights, a strong centralized state and economic collectivism and that is similar to European Socialism) but is more of a early stage, revolutionary form of it. 

The third method is through Left Acceleration since a full maturation of capitalism is the precondition for state socialist realization

This means implementing an Ayn Rand Objectivist form of inherently anarchistic Laissez Faire Capitalism (where private enterprises will be guided by invisible forces and competition rather than by the existence of a state like structure without copyright laws, property rights, and common defense without upsetting business owners and that also encourages productivity as one of its tenants) 

During this full maturation,  Classical Liberalism that balances the budget and boosts domestic production will be a factor in this Ayn Rand Objectivist form of inherently anarchistic Laissez Faire Capitalism

This transitional method would promote economical individual rights (including conditional and Left Rothbardian property rights) and be the only system based on the protection of those rights. 

The fourth method would be to use an alternative to the proletariat/Dictator of the proletariat to lead to this utopia. 

This alternative to the proletariat/Dictator of the proletariat would be to engage angry and unsatisfied people by taking control of social movements in a way similar to Leninism 4.0 and Marxist cultural studies. This would be to get this communistic society to take hold in the west by transforming cultural institutions but in a Democratic way that fosters mutual affection among Americans and does not cause some Americans to despise their fellow citizens for this alternative to the proletariat/Dictator of the proletariat

The first method will lead us directly to a State Socialist (State Socialism with strong worker’s rights,  a strong centralized state and economic collectivism and that is similar to European Socialism) society. 

However the second, third and fourth methods will not lead us to that society but only get us closer to it. If we use the second or third method, the next and final stage to lead to a State Socialist (State Socialism with strong worker’s rights,  a strong centralized state and economic collectivism and that is similar to European Socialism) society would be through Anarcho Syndicalism 

This type of Anarcho Syndicalism that would include some elements of worker radical syndicalism along with Laborism and moderately better social wages along with more hands on leadership councils who more directly help workers. It could interchangeably be called Anarcho Workerism (sometimes workers are in a war against their overlords so its understandable to see it from there side)

Basically it would be Autonomism which means in this stage we would force changes to the organization of capitalism independent of the state (whom we must fight against at all levels), trade unions and political parties through radical acts of rebellion (ie slow working, absenteeism-sabotage, socialization of the workplace and similar methods). 

This fiscal part of the work would be political, so that the worker himself/herself would force change without having to get political parties involved to do it for them. It would be anti systemic rebellion. This embodiment of this worker revolution would be an organic movement that is developed from a groundswell of awakened working class people and then the gradual transition toward the types of socialistic economies I support

To expand on this, we need more autonomous mass worker marches to show appreciation to our country's workers to make them want to help in our revolution. Maybe when workers of all race-ethnicities are united in a way that meshes with Autonomism, in their jobs and there is no more class conflict, this can happen

During this transitional stage, groups of businesses would work with the workers having greater profit through negotiations between unions and business groups, all of which would operate under a strongly extreme paternalistic anarchistic/socialist government (which would be commonplace in a Anarcho Syndicated transition to my State Socialist society) . Basically as a unique way for classes to collab/class co op to lead to an eventual classless society . 

During this Anarcho Syndicalist transition and after we get to a State Socialist (with strong worker’s rights, a strong centralized state and economic collectivism and that is similar to European Socialism) society , workers would get fuller/more control their places of employment which would make things like voluntary work from home easier to grasp for people not on board with it. This would be done through cooperative-diplomatic management of their industries. 

The goal would be to increase productivity. As long as those workers can guarantee this (or them being more reliable than Capitalism is 'reliable), then this would be set up for them. 

Basically self management (via individualism, autonomy and anti authoritianism), and even Republicans would be welcome to do this (and it is right up their ally since they always talk about small government and wanting more control of things, so them having more control of their work would be good for them).  Revolutionary spontaneity (alongside the Anarcho Syndicalism methods mentioned above to push forward to State Socialism) would be a way to make this a reality.   

Revolutionary spontaneity is a revolution against the Capitalist state and it can occur spontaneously by the worker class themselves, without the assistant of aid or guidance by another party (autonomously as mentioned a few paragraphs above). I believe that such revolution would not be caused by the actions of individuals (i.e professional revolutionaries or political parties). 

This is because it is in good taste to do it the ways I wrote above. People would disassociate themselves from such people in order to push them to be more effective in the revolution. Both sides have their own unique way to go against the Capitalist state

There would be self enforced labor discipline since no one is or would be above the law. Workers would be protected from being triggered 

During this transition to our State Socialist (State Socialism with strong worker’s rights,  a strong centralized state and economic collectivism and that is similar to European Socialism) society there would be more expansive Mutual aide set up, more as safety nets due to the nature of this bumpy transitional path.

These Mutual aid participants would work together to find strategies and resources that would meet each other's needs (like food, housing, medical care, and disaster relief), while organizing themselves against the system that created the shortage in the first place. This would help distribute needed resources more efficiently. It is human nature to favor cooperation for survival and mutual aid. People need each other 

To mesh with an eventual stateless, classless and hierarchical society, these Mutual Aide groups would be egalitarian , non hierarchical and non bureaucratic structures, with members controlling all resources , sort of like a make shift participatory democracy, with equality of member status and power that would be shared leadership and would be consensus based decision making

In our eventual State Socialist (State Socialism with strong worker’s rights,  a strong centralized state and economic collectivism and that is similar to European Socialism) society, the state would own the means of production (by a worker's party and/or a state-planned economy) via an association of manufacturers and suppliers , in a mix of public and private means (basically Left Rothbardian means) and or with workers having genuine control over the means of production through institutions such as trade unions. during the transition to the workers seizing the means of production and phasing out Capitalism as mentioned above and below and ultimately abolishing classes and our monetary system

Especially since as mentioned above this brand of State Socialism would have strong worker’s rights  Eventually, the state will wither away naturally after the fact (effectively becoming Collective Communistic) or wither away until it becomes limited/minimal

Eventually there would have to be a devolution of the ‘bourgeois’ state (or at worst a devolution to a limited/minimal state), where authority would be spread out to the revolutionary squads and organized via this form of Meritocracy

I believe the Kibbutz would be a good model for this post statist (or limited/minimal statist), moneyless world. It would be voluntary, promote work satisfaction, community, concern competition for prestige and praise from other community members instead of bosses and other corporate big whigs etc)

After the state withers away (or withers away until it is minimal/limited), I would want Austromarxism type of ‘Nationalism’ that is fused with Hyper National Liberalism to be implemented .This would be very similar to Ultra Left (Wing) economics that lead to Americanism with self determination

This would be done partly via Conservative Revolutionism which would create a post class analysis of this communistic stateless (Marxist) society (or limited/minimal state) and create a national community which would transcend the conventional divisions of left and right

In this post State Socialism (with strong worker’s rights, a strong centralized state and economic collectivism and that is similar to European Socialism) society or limited/minimal state society,  there would probably be something similar to a Patriotic Anarcho Social post statists (with patriotic warlords rising up as ‘monarchs’ counterposed against post state state equivalent bureaucracy or limited/minimal state, that represents the people against the ‘state’) that comes out of the things that I wrote above. 

If that is the case, then in that type of situation, I would want guilds and trade unions to be set up where they have influence by NGO adjacent and Left Rothbardian ‘private’ agencies (post governmental or limited/minimal state private) through indirect control that are aligned with critical liberalism. 

These guilds and trade unions would be Solidaric Syndicalist guilds and they would be used to maintain order and balance in this post State Socialism (with strong worker’s rights, a strong centralized state and economic collectivism and that is similar to European Socialism) society or limited/minimal state society (like Varys did in Game of Thrones)

This set up would be organic and be pro community. These Solidarity Syndicalist guilds would fight for increased worker protection while fighting against Free Masonry, Christian bigotry, Capitalism (if Capitalism comes back in this post State Socialism or limited/minimal state society) , decadence and postmodern Marxism 

When all of the above revolutions above come, all people destined to be on the losing side of it will be the counter revolutionaries.  

This is the fire of who were are in our needed solitary minds.  We need to make new positive values, to not hold on to materialism, to get rid of materialistic things that we don't need. We need to individualize spiritual wealth.  The revolutions above are the key to save our society from being pushed further and further right which it has been due to the failures of Capitalism.  Collectivization as mentioned above in this blog is needed to counter and fight against the counter revolutionaries. The lower class are friends of the revolution 

I support permanent voluntary work from home/voluntary remote work for workers in the US etc. My reason is, it allows workers to work during maternity leave/paternity leave, it allows workers who don't like socializing to not have to socialize and it is more pro worker which is something needed in this sometimes rough society we live in. But workers should not be allowed to do voluntary work from home or remote work because those work days fall on a holiday or for taking vacations. NOPE. Holidays are meaningless senseless days that make peoples lives worse not better.  They should get floating holidays for vacations only.

I think labor strikes will be much less needed when we usher in the pro labor utopia mentioned above especially since HR departments will fulfill a bigger role in such a society . I was sad with the strike busting of the 1980s but it's time to move on from that. However, labor strikes are good as mentioned above

Our politicians and country should have at least some compassion for our workers since they are the life blood of the economy. 

I support employee owned businesses 

I support the disenfranchised Middle Class/Lower Middle Class-working class especially socially patriotic ones

I support rural populations getting their fair share which is why I feel Agrarian Socialism is good for them. I support Farm Aid

I support poor farmers which is why I feel that collectivization of agriculture is good for them

Antis

I am generally Anti Capitalist . Capitalism is degeneracy .My issues with Capitalism are that the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. Capitalism has caused horrors like the Great Depression and the fiscal ills that caused mass uprisings in the late 19th century to early mid 20th century. Capitalism is the cause of many of our society's ills.  Capitalism is also bad because it is materialistic. If Capitalism leads to something worse than Capitalism, I am open to trying to reform it (I am a Social Democrat after all) but through solidarity and Interculturalism (to fix the classist and similar issues that Capitalism has). Capitalism is also bad because the super rich (1%ers) and their crony allies dominate the markets and that is wrong and must be stopped. We need all the bipartisan and strange bedfellow help we can get to defeat Capitalism

I am an Anti Globalist, I am especially against subversive Globalism which should be countered

I am Anti Globalization . The rise of the bourgeoisie has led to globalization. To quote Karl Marx from the Communist Manifesto "In place of the old wants, satisfied by the production of the country, we find new wants, requiring for their satisfaction the products of distant lands and climes. In place of the old local and national seclusion and self-sufficiency, we have intercourse in every direction, universal inter-dependence of nations. Just as it has made the country dependent on the towns, so it has made barbarian and semi-barbarian countries dependent on the civilised ones, nations of peasants on nations of bourgeois, the East on the West.... Though not in substance, yet in form, the struggle of the proletariat with the bourgeoisie is at first a national struggle. The proletariat of each country must, of course, first of all settle matters with its own bourgeoisie."

I am against fiscal corruption

I am Anti International Communism (which is distinct from Communism)

I am against Global Capitalism 

All of the above groups are responsible for our society's ills

I am not down with Anti Marxist-Leninism or one word Marxism. They betray my combined fiscal views since they are less classically liberal than my combined fiscal views. Both have also caused issues including enabling the evil forms of Capitalist imperialism to destroy societies. 

However, I believe that Leninism and Right Wing Marxism along with French early 20th century Marxism can be used as a gateway ideology to better political ideologies including the ones mentioned in this blog and thus can be good temp ideologies . A lot of good politicians and pundits use to be Leninists and Right Wing Marxists and early 20th century France type of Marxists

I reject elitism as the method for the dissemination of class consciousness. The cultural interests of the intellectuals and the interests of the working class (as a self enclosed class), have hardly anything in common except the largely general claim for humanly decent existence

I am against the Great Reset. The Great Reset and stuff like raising the minimum wage to 25 dollars an hour , Single Payer health care etc are examples of social fascist politicians and their crony allies exploiting the pandemic to push and implement social fascist unneeded fiscal policies like those policies and that is wrong and twisted

I am against Neoliberalism

I distrust large financial institutions as corrupt 

I am very much against offshoring jobs

I am against inheritance taxes

I strongly do not support Free Masonry (as mentioned above) and this discussion provides good insights into Free Masonry and how it should be criticized 

Rich

I am against taxing the rich, since I don't believe there should be rich people to tax and I am for getting rid of the rich class especially the aristocratic ,crony/bourgeois rich class, thus not needing to 'tax the rich'. We need to ‘eat the aristocrat, crony/bourgeois rich’ so to speak.

Rich people  are elitist, classist and have things they don't need . For example, Musicians and celebrities in Hollywood have mansions, rich cars, closets of gaudy clothes etc which are monuments to their wealth and power, all because they can read from a script or sing as good as me.  That stuff is just there to show off how rich and 'better than everyone' they are, since its unneeded.   Now if they let non rich fans (or stans) hang in their mansion every so often, and shared things with their fans and stans like in the book of Acts, I would be radically centrist on their excesses or maybe not 

However, I look the other way with my former church group (from the late 2000s) friend Kelsey and her family's 'upper middle class' type living, my former church group member Ben and his wife Sheri's  'upper middle class' type living and any similar types of 'upper middle class' living that are extremely similar  (but for personal reasons and because those people were blessed)

Countries should prioritize the needs of the people over the state, investing in agriculture and consumer goods (in a way I deem fair) over heavy industry and the military

Communism's issues are authoritarianism  (i.e its simplistic religious cult like enthusiasm). Communism is inferior to systems that foster free association/disassociation for individuals and groups of which fight for more fair labor practices.  I support the emancipation of the individual 

I'm against President Biden's IRS bank snooping plan and his plan to unprivatize banks

White collar criminals deserve harsher prison and more time for their crimes . Being rich shouldn't allow them to get breaks. We need to show poor people that white collar criminals get equal justice to non white collar criminals

Greedy and corrupt Republicans and Far right wing Capitalists push the middle class to the left which is good for us but it doesn't absolve the Republicans and Far right wing Capitalists of their greed and corruption 

Property

The only wealth and property that matters is ethical and spiritual wealth and property. When we move on to the 'next life', we only will take those things with us. All other things are immaterial

I feel in the State Socialist Society that I write above (and the transitional stages to it) that property can only be legitimately owned by two means: direct trade from the past owner of that property to a new owner or the potential new owner applying the labor to unowned land. I use this idea to found its claim on the confiscation of the private property, in particular the part about applying the potential new owner’s labor to said unowned property (Applying it to 'ill gotten property') is legitimate leads to legitimate ownership of that property.

The difference between the Classic homesteading principle and this Neo Lockean principle is that the first means also accepts the Lockean proviso as legit, which states that the homesteading principle only applies so long as there is enough of and of the same quality for everybody else, while this Neo Lockean principle rejects this.

I heavily advocate for the respect of private property as a natural right which I derive from the right of self ownership. However I do not see property as legitimate if it is a derivative of coercion, including, if the property derives from state benefits.

I am against the idea that government regulation helps to eliminate or mitigate oppression by the big corporations since I believe the state is the source of the problem it says to solve.

I don’t agree with the view that the Gilded Age was a Laissez-Faire period where the state did not have interference and where the free markets ran the world. The Gilded Age was marked by huge state privilege to selected capital owners and corporations

These state benefits came in ways such as tax breaks, subsidies, or even direct monopolies on certain industries, even though there were certain big businesses at the time which didn't get privileges from the government.

I believe that these types of corporations which the state benefited with more or less largesse should be allowed to be seized by their workers (or third parties) to eliminate state benefits to companies

I support the seizure of "private" property through the homestead principle since that type of property is derived from theft (i.e subsidies funded by taxes) it thus is not legitimately owned, and thus the rightful owners are the ones who apply the labor to said illegitimate property. 

I feel that property that was previously stolen by the government legitimizes the seizure of this property. 

Like, if the state built a college with money from tax payers, applying my homesteading principle, the college is rightfully the property of those who had been stolen. However, since it's not easy to find out who the university is going to be given to (since it's not stolen from a precise individual), then I feel it's rightfully the property of the workers who by mixing their labor with the facilities have claimed this illegitimate property. 

We should consider though, that while they are to be rightfully property of those workers who applied their labor,  they are, to an extent, beneficiaries of the government. Thus the second group which can be selected for this ownership are the students themselves who lost their money paying for the maintainance of this ‘ill gotten’ property and the payment of the faculty.

This can be applied like for companies which have benefited from the robbery directly like colleges that get 2/3 of their income from the state. This would also legitimizes the seizure of those colleges by their workers, since a significant part of the benefit of that comes from stolen property. It’s only just that, still applying my homestead principle, the college is seized by the workers. This slow reduction of the state would eventually hopefully lead to a stateless society led by market forces and private property.

Banks

I support nationalizing the Federal Reserve

I am against big bank, I support the Occupy Wall Street Movement. For too long Big Bank have exploited us non bourgeois to make themselves richer, including during the recession .They enable corrupt investors to make this bad situation even worse. We must reform or reimagine our banking and investing systems to fix that,Occupy Wall Street was a step in the right direction. I stand with Elizabeth Warren on bank reform. But we need to get rid of Capitalism or at worst, get rid the crony, bankocratic forms of it (ie corrupt financing). That’s why I have no sympathy for banks when they get robbed.

I am ok with independent banking companies being created and helping each other to help others when it is needed in cases when government intervention is not ideal or wanted

Govcracy

I am all for reducing taxes, regulation and government spending 

I am against leaders who are against Producerism 

I support more strict tariffs against various countries in an effort to promote keeping jobs in the US . To achieve this, I want compassionate intervention by private government to give boosts to various companies within the US

I support nationalizing some larger financial institutions more than just in emergency situations and even if we aren’t in a State Socialist economy, including using things like bailouts (ie Barack Obama's late 2000s bailouts) on a more common basis. Moreover, I believe the government or state giving more credit to banks is a necessary evil so we don't have depressions or recessions

I am against trade restrictions, I support free trade except in rare times that it's not viable in which case I support protectionism .We must protect local industries from foreign corruption . I support fair trade in times when neither is viable 

I am against many aspects of FDR’s New Deal and I feel they need retroactive amendments 

I believe that the government should give more freedom to private enterprise (in a Left Rothbardian way), and less intervention in private economies. I support more Left Rothbardian privatization

Monetary policies should be used to get rid of inflation along with temporarily bringing back the Gold Standard to help do so if we can’t move left on the economy

I favor privatization (Left Rothbardian privatization) as a way to remove state monopolies on various things along with awarding concessions. 

Big corp / corps

I want Amazon and Big Tech to be broken up. We have to stop their monopolies. There is no reason so many people should wear the same brand of clothes, or be a member of the same social media site. Movie character Arthur Jensen's speech in his movie about how corporations are the real nations of the world today seems frighteningly prophetic after decades of increasing globalism and corporate 'synergy'.  I am against monopoly Capitalism 

I favor Social Corporatism in hard to explain ways. I also am ok with NGO in specific and creative ways. But I oppose regular Corporatism. However, I want to eliminate corporate personhood 

In a static capitalist economy, I favor the type of state corporatism/Right Syndicalism where the state integrates corporations into the economic structure etc

That means the state intergrates large corporations into its economical structure, as a better way to Nationalize certain industries (resources, war production being 2 main examples the latter of which is cool because they did that in with T. A. Gillespie Company making WWI ammo for the US during WWI ). This is good because if corporations want to be political they will have to do this to make it ‘official’

Most small businesses are NOT tax cheats and Justin Trudeau was wrong to lie and say that

Socioeconomics

I support a sophisticated form of government assistance (though not elitist government assistance)

I fight against youth poverty and poverty in general

I support right to privacy and right to be forgotten

I support a more poor friendly and compassionate Section 8 housing system

I support Universal Basic Income once a certain level of income has been obtained

I support a complex and advanced welfare and assistance program that is creative . It has elements of Austromarxist Welfare (like in early 20th century Austria where the welfare state was built up and people profited from social reforms including via housing)

I believe Universal Welfare should be implemented but in a socialistic economy as opposed to a capitalistic economy.

I’d like to see the US implement compulsory healthcare for private employees and their family members fused with Big Medicine healthcare-Single payer healthcare (that is publicly subsidized) then gradually move toward a nationalized, free healthcare system (when a certain level of wealth is obtained in our country so that there is no reason for a country not to create such a system) where, in the name of medical improvement and civic liberty, the state would control (in a way that wouldn’t trigger me) peoples health during their lifetime to keep as many people as possible in good health to create a truly healthy and spiritual nation 

I conditionally supporting free school where the government indirectly pays for it (indirectly as in four degrees of separation indirect), and kids have to use toy money to pay for their free schooling

My views on Build Back Better are based on my fiscal views, however it would be nice to see us rebuild our infrastructure 

I am against raising the minimum wage to 30 dollars an hour (and maybe even against 25 dollars an hour). Such high minimum wage increase would be authoritarian and devaluing hard work if the government did that. I am fine with 15 dollar an hour and maybe even 22 dollar an hour minimum wage laws but I am against 30 dollars an hour minimum wage laws and maybe even against 25 dollars an hour

I do not support student debt forgiveness ideas. Students should work to pay off their student debts instead of relying on the government to do so. If I was a student I'd love it, until I realized how impractical it was. My fiscal views above show how I think students should deal with student debt

I believes in rapid green industrialization in certain places

I support Bitcoin workshops and I have no real issues with Bitcoin

I dislike everything and everyone since it is fun to be like that and because the state of our world. This blog gives a glimpse into my reasons. Just kidding I like everything and everyone, if I didn’t like everything and everyone, no one would like me

Values

I am a Anarcho Post Statist explorer with Christian Communism characteristics (since it might have a use somewhere since country is everything [generally speaking])  

Sacrificing yourself for the 'greater good' is futile since our society is made up of individuals instead of a cohesive unit that is separate from the individual. Collective control is not consistent with anarchism and is authoritarian  Real freedom can only happen in a truly free society. Misanthropicism is wrong

I support economic justice. I support the lower middle classes and all classes equally

I am fine with the aggravation of class struggle. I support class warfare as mentioned way above against petty bourgeois/aristocratic reactionaries (including corrupt super rich cronies and investors) who have all their socioeconomic wealth handed down to them and cause society to loathe them

I support all classes of society coming together to help our society grow. I support class equality and class unity. We should focus on the future of our nation.

Though I do support class struggle when needed to achieve that but I prefer peace over struggle

I support self control

I am anti authoritarian especially with views of wisdom

I am a new age Survivalist 

I am generally against gentrification.  

I feel that individuals are entitled to freedom

I support some things from Mahayana

I support generally support Individualism but as a force of Individuals each bringing their own unique reality to compliment each other in a moral relativist sort of way

I support free inquiry 

I am against Transnational Progressiveness 

I have a right to question authority as do all Americans

We must be wary of some Boogaloo Movement groups who may be right wing. 

Our party should embrace science more (including science that takes cues from sci fi/science low fantasy since sci fi/science low fantasy. Sci fi/science low fantasy has become so real nowadays it may help improve science by giving some outside the box ideas)

I support Democratic Underground's policies against criticism of Democrats. Dissent like that on that site can cause splinter groups who could be used by the far right and right wingers to hurt our party. 

In a perfect world, the DNC would create our own (Democrat/Liberal/Progressive) brand of media that is based on Democrat/Liberal/Progressive values (and is affiliated with us like MoveOn.org and the Daily Kos is affiliated with us) and make sure it supplants the MSM (Daily Kos and DU isn't enough). That way the MSM wouldn't need to show 'liberal bias', since they'd be the fringe and would be free to do whatever they want

I believe having healthy friendly rivalries with other countries (like Yankees-Red Sox rivalry or Michigan-Ohio State rivalry) is a healthy good thing. Being patriotically proud of your country is a healthy good thing 

I don't like transplants moving into areas and taking their culture away (i.e Californians in Oregon, Midwest Hipsters in NYC, transplants from various areas in Colorado etc). It also deludes the fun of moving somewhere new since some transplants in some of those places are from the same area that the person moving to that area is from. 

I am a Christian pacifist

I am anti authoritarian

I am against anti totalitarian humanism

I believe Anarchy and the left need to evolve more to be more spiritual and humanistic 

I am against Nihilism and I believe people should overcome it to live more fulfilling lives. If people don't go up when they pass away, they will have to overcome Nihilism on their own in the afterlife without religion to help them to do so.  I did so back in college, where, after I was freaked out by learning of Eternal Return,  I then found out that Eternal Return is set forth by God in a creative way that isn't so nihilist or depressing. I realized back then that God sets forth Eternal Return in a way that when we realize what that way is, we as mentioned above overcome Nihilism and live more fulfilling lives. 

Frederick Nietzche's unique views of the world when combined with Liberal Marxism would be a unique political system that might work in some countries or areas

Republicans GOPers, including moderate Republicans and alt righters don't share our liberal/progressive/Democrat values . They don't care about the welfare of the people in our big tent like we care for them because they don't share our values (moral relativeness is real but that's no excuse for them) 

Thus Republican GOPers including moderate Republicans and alt righters don't have nearly as many redeeming qualities as us liberals/progressives/Democrats.  This is why its easier for me to forgive fellow liberals/progressives and Democrats for their mistakes than Republican GOPers, including moderate Republicans and alt righters

We should go against Republicans and use all people from both sides and Independents to do so

I am against people having a sense of entitlement 

I am laid back in my own unique way

There needs to be balance between rational thought (ie reason) and passion for people 

I support perspectivism

I am against materialism. Materialism is a spook. God says that the only wealth that matters is spiritual wealth and ethical wealth since those are the only materials we can take from this life to heaven. So materialism loses its luster when you think of that way. We need to individualize spiritual wealth.  

I am against consumer culture and materialism. I feel people and their individualism are enslaved by materialism i.e their property. It is wrong that people are obsessed with their property. It is pathetic that people wear the same types of clothes, follow fashion trends, have big flat screen TVs, wear Nikes sneakers or even sneakers themselves, and similar unneeded nonsense. We have to break people free of this bondage to consumerism and materialism.  This in part because of corporate monopolies.   See my lifestyle blog post for more

Consumerism and Materialism are by products of the evils of Capitalism where people are just objects by Capitalists and corporations to make a buck and get ahead (basically as stepping stones). Consumerism and materialism are at the heart of the soullessness of Capitalism

Capitalism a lot of the time destroys or hampers countries and the structures within them. We must subvert consumerism, materialism and commercialism

I am against consumer culture. I am an anti Consumerist.  Consumerism fuels inequality and unequal social structures that create unequal hierarchies.  Consumerism is bad because people consume to increase their social position and to keep up with others. There is no good reason people should continuously buy new and new material possessions. It is against God to do so. God gives us what we need, not more and more garbage.

Corporations push consumerism to make a buck at the expense of public welfare (due to things like social stratification, governing ethics etc). I also feel consumerism is bad because it is part of globalization in that corporations try to destroy other countries with their consumerism as they've done in the West.  Consumers are treated like guinea pigs that corporations try new and new tricks on to get them to obedient to their demands and that is wrong

Consumerism dehumanizes people and causes people to live immorally. Consumerism is shallow, hollow and makes people think they need things that they DON'T NEED. It also causes pollution and hurts the environment etc. Consumerism is basically corporations making us their slaves and that needs to end

People are compelled to use brand names since their identities are tied to brand names to compensate for other misgivings.

To quote Victor Lebow "Our enormously productive economy demands that we make consumption our way of life, that we convert the buying and use of goods into rituals, that we seek our spiritual satisfaction and our ego satisfaction in consumption. We need things consumed, burned up, worn out, replaced, and discarded at an ever-increasing rate"

Consumerism via advertisers intrude on peoples lives telling them what they 'need' and what is 'acceptable' when in fact them doing those things is unneeded and unacceptable. It is basically ad creep and unwanted. 

They try to force social standards. They make it seem their goods are the keys to happiness and that is disgusting, wrong and crude. Advertisers try to trick people into tying social and material together through their ads to make this happen. They contribute to materialism and that needs to end.  What is worse, these advertisers don't want consumers to be truly happy, otherwise their products would not be needed. It's basically a sick game for them

Advertisers objectify the consumers and take their power (and freedom) away while making the consumer think they have the power (when that isn't the case). The short term nature of the gratifcation of commodities take away from a truly lasting happy society. Advertising creates a false mirage of the world which furthers my angst for consumerism and its tenants.

To quote New scientist magazine "subconsciously still driven by an impulse for survival, domination and expansion... an impulse which now finds expression in the idea that inexorable economic growth is the answer to everything, and, given time, will redress all the world's existing inequalities" While also writing  "that consumerism is making these tendencies worse by encouraging consumption without limit."   The best way to counter bourgeois boredom is through being politically active, non consumerism or materialism. I feel that authoritarian socialist commodity production might be a way to fix this snd fight against materialism and consumerism

I support the inalienable right of self preservation of Americans against punitive and unsanctioned control